Someone sent me the article in Time is called "Choosy Mothers Choose Cesareans"

This is really sad and offensive and represents a continued assault on women's bodies.
It reminds me of James DeMeo's book "Saharasia" where he compared
C-sections and breast augmentation to genital infant mutilation and piercings-
It is a sadistic secondary drive-and representative of the need to "cut" rather than love the sex organs.
There is a good mix of c-sectioners out there-
some selfish, others ignorant, some with physical disabilities within the pelvic organs, and others with severe pelvic trauma and emotional issues in the pelvis that experience womb stasis which contributes to a likely hood of c-sections-and subsequent c-sections because of psychosomatic stressors.
I would like to see a balanced representations by all parties,
but you know that won't happen...
Just as Sarah Silverman flaunts abortions as being funny and fun-
there are c-sectioners who flaunt their inability to birth and
go through the blocks standing in their way to birth...and bring natural birthers down with them.
We natural birthers get the fallout and our treated like weirdos.
I was introduced at an intellectual party as the "Woman who had those homebirths" looked like everyone there knew about me, and not in a good way....
It becomes a threatening stereotype like anything else.
I am committed to helping women through this block, but they need to want to help themselves-too, and whether they escape with drugs or herbs its all the same, the emotional body is the hardest to deal with but the most important to heal...sometimes I feel like giving up...
This is hard work!
Thanks for this article,
Stay strong )O(
Aurore
www.beyondnaturalmedicine.com